or
Join Now!
|
|
Home/Education/Languages/Latin
|
| Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
| Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
| I'm sorry, posting again |
Junya |
09/03/07 |
Hi. It's Junya from Japan.
Et sic in eis est virtus, id est in quantum elevatae sunt a materia, et rationi obediunt.
http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/qdw103.html
You can search the page by copying and pasting this sentence. If you don't know how to do so, then I will paste the whole passage from now on. But it would be a big labor for you to read the whole passage I'm concerned. So, if you want to avoid such a labor, please tell me frankly.
And I want to be sure about the privious answer. Your opinion is that the substantive use of adjective is ordinarily in neuter form, not in masculine or feminine, isn't it?
But as I translate this book, I find places where Thomas seems to be using "irascibilis and concuscibilis" substantively.
Am I misreading, or is it an irregular use by Thomas?
|
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|
