Clarification/Follow-up by peddler7118 on 09/07/06 4:20 pm:
You cannot have moral values as an atheist. Only a personal choice to follow the moral teachings of Christianity.
Secular humanism teaches situational ethics.
Saying we should be moral and kind is simply your opinion. What right have you to say anything is wrong? Is your opinion superior to anyone else’s?
Some people, like the atheists /evolutionist Peter Singer, advocate abortion up to the day before delivery and euthanasia at the discretion of the Mother afterwards. What right do you have to condemn him? On what grounds? Popular opinion? The Romans left baby girls to die or be picked up by the brothel owners, that was the norm, how can you say your opinion is superior to the vast majority of people?
It may be you act in a moral, ethical manner but what right do you have to tell another organism that they should also be moral and ethical.
If they decided to shoot you how can you say they are wrong?
How can you say slavery is wrong? That is only your opinion.
It was Christians who believed the Bible who freed the slaves.
Act 17:26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
Act 17:27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:
Act 17:28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
Liberal theologians influenced by the millions of years nonsense and Darwinian racism used instructions to the Hebrews and justified enslaving black people.
Evolutionist shot Aborigines and boiled their skulls for museums to display as missing links.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/OneBlood/chapter9.asp
How can you say they were wrong? That is simply your opinion.
Eugenics
Darwinism has provided scientific support for eugenics
Darwin warned against allowing "the weak members of civilised societies [to] propagate their kind"
"With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed." (Darwin, Charles R. [English naturalist and founder of the modern theory of evolution], "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex," [1871], John Murray: London, Second Edition, 1922, reprint, pp.205-206) [top]
Evolutionist shot them and boiled there skulls for museums to display as missing links.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/OneBlood/chapter9.asp
How can you say they were wrong? That is simply your opinion.
Clarification/Follow-up by fyvel on 09/07/06 4:21 pm:
Yes, it would be wiser to not feed the troll. However, I do find it difficult to let such ridiculous statements go unanswered. To make up for my lack of control, I also reported the troll to abuse. :)
Clarification/Follow-up by peddler7118 on 09/07/06 4:45 pm:
So stating my opinion is abuse but calling me an idiot , Tom a liar, and accusing creationists of flying airplanes into buildings is not?
That is the best you can do when your brain shoots blanks I guess.
Somehow I think you will lose that battle, flying airplanes into buildings is a bit much, don't you think?