Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 06/20/07 1:26 pm:
Dark Crow,

>>>Personally, I believe the moral impact of ‘value’ is the better reason to reject both homosexuality and same sex marriage.<<<

Value judgments are fine when people actually have the ability to make such judgments. However, I believe that many liberals have lost that ability. They now worship at the alter of science and emotions rather than G-d and values. So instead I make a scientific argument.

Please go to the following link for a discussion of what I am talking about. The clip is about 45 minutes long, but well worth the time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

Elliot

Clarification/Follow-up by Dark_Crow on 06/20/07 4:16 pm:
I will follow the link, thanks.
As a side note:

Following continued protests from gay activists at APA (American Psychiatric Association) annual conferences for three years running i.e.1970 to 1973 the 7 printing of the
DSM-II,(The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) in 1974, no longer listed homosexuality as a category of disorder.

I think it is interesting to note that Political Pressure and not clinical studies convinced the APA to amend the seventh printing of the DSM-II to a milder category of "sexual orientation disturbance".

So much for objectivity in Science; Choux, where are you?

Dr. Robert L. Spitzer led the debate in favor of "sexual orientation disturbance" – However, a couple of years latter they even turned on him when he argued that "highly motivated" individuals could "successfully" change their sexual orientation from homosexual to heterosexual.