or
Join Now!
|
|
Home/Government/Politics
|
| Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
| Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
| The latest on global warming...again |
Itsdb |
06/05/07 |
Get the tin-foil hats out again:
Agencies cut back efforts to monitor global warming from space
The Bush administration is drastically scaling back efforts to measure global warming from space, just as President Bush tries to convince the world the United States is ready to take the lead in reducing greenhouse gases.
A confidential report to the White House, obtained by The Associated Press, warns that U.S. scientists will soon lose much of their ability to monitor warming from space using a costly and problem-plagued satellite initiative begun more than a decade ago.
Because of technology glitches and a near-doubling in the original $6.5 billion cost, the Defense Department has decided to downsize and launch four satellites paired into two orbits, instead of six satellites and three orbits.
The satellites were intended to gather weather and climate data, replacing existing satellites as they come to the end of their useful lifetimes beginning in the next couple of years.
The reduced system of four satellites will now focus on weather forecasting. Most of the climate instruments needed to collect more precise data over long periods are being eliminated.
Instead, the Pentagon and two partners -- the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA -- will rely on European satellites for most of the climate data.
"Unfortunately, the recent loss of climate sensors ... places the overall climate program in serious jeopardy," NOAA and NASA scientists told the White House in the Dec. 11 report obtained by the AP.
They said they will face major gaps in data that can be collected only from satellites about ice caps and sheets, surface levels of seas and lakes, sizes of glaciers, surface radiation, water vapor, snow cover and atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Rick Piltz, director of Climate Science Watch, a watchdog program of the Washington-based Government Accountability Project, called the situation a crisis.
"We're going to start being blinded in our ability to observe the planet," said Piltz, whose group provided the AP with the previously undisclosed report. "It's criminal negligence, and the leaders in the climate science community are ringing the alarm bells on this crisis."
It's "criminal negligence" to quit wasting so much money on a "problem-plagued satellite initiative"? Here's an idea, let's make this thing work before we drive the screws deeper into the American people. Shouldn't it be criminal to give idiots like this a public forum?
The UN has issued its latest IPCC installment:
If global warming was doing things at a "chilling pace" wouldn't it be cooling? We're now back to the drastic sea rise scenario:
Surfing anyone? |
Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 06/05/07 2:48 pm:
Oh yeah, and Canada, the United States, and Russia have the worst "green record," though "the United States scores the worst of all G8 countries" of course. Surprised?
|
| |
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|
