or
Join Now!
|
|
Home/Government/Politics
|
| Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
| Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
| Huh? |
Itsdb |
04/30/07 |
Sorry if this is old news to you, but did any of you hear Schmucky Schumer telling us what Harry Reid meant by saying the Iraq war is lost?
"What Harry Reid is saying is that this war is lost -- in other words, a war where we mainly spend our time policing a civil war between Shiites and Sunnis. We are not going to solve that problem. . . . The war is not lost. And Harry Reid believes this -- we Democrats believe it. . . . So the bottom line is if the war continues on this path, if we continue to try to police and settle a civil war that's been going on for hundreds of years in Iraq, we can't win. But on the other hand, if we change the mission and have that mission focus on the more narrow goal of counterterrorism, we sure can win."
It's good that Democrats are on board with Bush and Petraeus' counterterrorism efforts in Iraq. Or are they? Who the heck knows what they're thinking, they seem to be straddling both sides of the fence as usual. |
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|
