Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 05:54:34 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
Genetic Engineering ETWolverine 12/22/06
    DOCS' DESIGNER DEFECT BABY

    By ANDY GELLER
    December 22, 2006

    If you have the right doctor and the right lab, you can have a baby with the right "designer disability."

    That's right - you can create a baby with a birth defect.

    For years, the medical world has been abuzz with talk of creating perfect designer babies through prenatal testing.

    Now, some doctors are doing the opposite - making babies with made-to-order genetic defects, according to The Associated Press.

    The procedure is an ethical minefield, but parents with disabilities like deafness or dwarfism say it just means making babies like themselves.

    A recent Johns Hopkins survey of 137 American clinics that offer embryo screening found that four of them have done the procedure, which costs $15,000.

    One of the nation's leading experts in reproductive medicine, Dr. Jamie Grifo of New York University, believes parents should be able to decide whether or not to have the procedure.

    "Parents should certainly have a say in how they should be able to make decisions about how to conduct their reproductive lives, rather than leaving it up to some regulator or legislator," he said.

    The procedure, part of a technique called preimplantation genetic diagnosis is done after eggs and sperm are mixed in a lab dish.

    Before the embryo is implanted in the womb, a cell is removed to allow doctors to examine it for a genetic defect. In the past, such an embryo would be discarded.

    But now, if the embryo contains a gene for, say, dwarfism or deafness, it is implanted in the womb.

    Grifo does not believe the practice is widespread. "I'm the expert, and I've never had anyone ask for me to do it," he said.

    The phrase "designer disability" was coined after two deaf lesbian psychotherapists used sperm from a deaf family friend to have two deaf children.

    Cara Reynolds of Collingswood, N.J., considered having the procedure so she could have a dwarf baby.

    In part, she felt she ought to be able to decide whether she could have a child that looks like her and her husband, Gibson, also a dwarf.

    "You cannot tell me that I cannot have a child who's going to look like me. It's just unbelievably presumptuous, and they're playing God," she said.

    But her decision was also based on the fact that the couple's newborn daughter died last year from a dwarfism-related disease called homozygous achondroplasia.

    Dwarf couples have a 25 percent chance of having babies afflicted with the lethal condition.

    "I'm looking to avoid a fatal condition in my next child," she said. "This is not a light decision. My child died in my husband's arms, and I don't want that to happen again."

    But Reynolds ultimately decided against the procedure because her insurance didn't cover it and her age, 39, limited her chances for success. She now plans to adopt a dwarf baby. With Post Wire Services

    ----------------

    This is dangerous moral and legal territory we are treading here. Creating "perfect" designer babies is problematic in its own right, though if it eliminates disabilities and genetic disease, I'd be willing to back it. But do doctors have the moral right to deliberately create babies with disabilities, who will suffer from those disabilities for their entire lives (even if they end up living "happy" lives), just because the parents want it for whatever reason? Do parents have a moral right to request it? Does the government have a moral right to get involved in regulating genetic testing for the purposes of "engineering" designer babies? How about religious laws... where do they stand on genetic engineering of either "perfect" babies or "designer disabilities"? What are the moral, legal and religious reprecussions of this technology?

    Elliot

      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 12/22/06 6:02 pm:
      No Jim, I haven't missed the trend, just why anyone would choose for their child to be deaf and miss out on all the beautiful sounds, like birds, music, a newborn baby crying...

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. Elliot, Imagine this...scientists are able to either scree...
12/22/06 ItsdbExcellent or Above Average Answer
2. Sick....
12/22/06 labmanExcellent or Above Average Answer
3. The most recent research has revealed that more genetic diff...
12/23/06 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
4. Now we are going to have to hear about "Parent's Right...
12/24/06 drgadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.