Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 06:27:29 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
US COUNTERINSURGENCY MANUAL PRINTED ON WEB Choux... 12/17/06
    "Our IraqSlogger editors are stunned that the Pentagon has released to the entire world and posted on the Web the U.S. military’s new 282-page counterinsurgency war-fighting manual.

    This is the first post-9/11 “war on terror”-era U.S. military counterinsurgency manual – the long-awaited doctrine meant in part to help turn the tide for U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    The counterinsurgency field manual's cover reads in part, "Distribution Restriction: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited."

    Why?

    Now you and everyone, including Al Qaeda terrorists and insurgents, can read the entire 282-page manual.

    It's posted on multiple military Web sites.

    While the manual doesn’t contain classified secrets, it contains an astounding amount of seemingly sensitive military doctrine, with subject headings including:

    -- INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE OPERATIONS

    -- HUMAN INTELLIGENCE AND OPERATIONAL REPORTING

    -- COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERRECONNAISSANCE

    -- INTELLIGENCE COLLABORATION

    -- INTELLIGENCE CELLS AND WORKING GROUPS

    -- PROTECTING SOURCES

    -- EXECUTING COUNTERINSURGENCY OPERATIONS

    -- TARGETING

    Should such sensitive and detailed information be dished up to the U.S.’s enemies, especially via Pentagon Web sites?

    In the manual's foreword, Lt. Generals David Petreaus and James Amos write in part, "With our Soldiers and Marines fighting insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is essential that we give them a manual that provides principles and guidelines for counterinsurgency operations."

    How would a U.S. soldier or Marine now in Iraq or Afghanistan feel knowing the hot-off-the-presses counterinsurgency manual is available to the “bad guys” at the same time it is available to the “good guys”?

    Granted, the Pentagon posts a lot on the Web, but it seems fair to ask whether this entire 282-page document (surely, there are additional classified components) should be made available to all.

    Will the manual be of value to Al Qaeda terrorists, Iraqi insurgents, and the Taliban?

    Would the U.S. think it had scored an intelligence coup if it got its hands on the insurgents' 282-page field manual?

    How would the American people respond if asked in a poll whether the U.S. military's counterinsurgency manual should be shared with the insurgents?

    "Your IraqSlogger team will keep an eye out on terrorist and insurgent Web sites to see whether they provide links to Pentagon Web sites providing the counterinsurgency manual -- or whether they go so far as to translate the manual into Arabic and other languages.

    Stay tuned."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    What the eff?

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 12/18/06 12:13 pm:
      why not admit that what I say is true ? Just look at what ABC News says about the insurgency hand book written by Lt. Col. John Nagl.

      Roadside and other bomb attacks "are not aimed at killing U.S. soldiers," he says.

      Instead Nagl asserts the insurgents conduct the attacks for propaganda.

      "They want those pictures to show up on TVs in America, and they use it to recruit on the Internet," the lieutenant colonel says.
      Practically every insurgent operation in Iraq had a video camera unit attached. The American MSM does the enemy's work...willingly.

      Winning hearts and minds in the real world is convincing them that resistence is futile and that it is better to throw in their lot with the counterinsugency .


      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 12/18/06 7:14 pm:
      What's the matter Choux, still don't like inconvenient facts? Your IraqSlogger is only 5 months late in 'breaking' the story. I'm sure the folks at fas.org would be surprised to learn this revelation is "Only on Slogger."

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. Maybe they wanted it released before it got leaked ? Here ...
12/17/06 tomder55Average Answer
2. Looking at recent history: - The NSA "wire-tapping" p...
12/18/06 ETWolverineAverage Answer
3. The main question is: "Will the manual be of value to Al...
12/18/06 drgadeAverage Answer
4. And here I thought the left was for more openness from this ...
12/18/06 ItsdbPoor or Incomplete Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.