Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 05:45:42 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
What Do You Make of This? jackreade 08/13/06
    LONDON - "NBC News has learned that U.S. and British authorities had a significant disagreement over when to move in on the suspects in the alleged plot to bring down trans-Atlantic airliners bound for the United States.

    A senior British official knowledgeable about the case said British police were planning to continue to run surveillance for at least another week to try to obtain more evidence, while American officials pressured them to arrest the suspects sooner. The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the case.

    In contrast to previous reports, the official suggested an attack was not imminent, saying the suspects had not yet purchased any airline tickets. In fact, some did not even have passports.


    The source did say, however, that police believe one U.K.-based suspect was ready to conduct a "dry run." British authorities had wanted to let him go forward with part of the plan, but the Americans balked.

    At the White House, a top aide to President Bush denied the account.

    "There was unprecedented cooperation and coordination between the U.S., the U.K. and Pakistani officials throughout the case," said Frances Townsend, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, "and we worked together to protect our citizens from harm while ensuring that we gathered as much info as possible to bring the plotters to justice. There was no disagreement between U.S. and U.K. officials."

    Another U.S. official, however, acknowledges there was disagreement over timing. Analysts say that in recent years, American security officials have become edgier than the British in such cases because of missed opportunities leading up to 9/11.

    Aside from the timing issue, there was excellent cooperation between the British and the Americans, officials told NBC....."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 08/14/06 6:28 pm:
      >>>Five stars until the last sentence. <<<

      Yes, well, the truth hurts, doesn't it.

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. The US had PR reasons for the early intervention, noteably f...
08/13/06 MicroGlyphicsAverage Answer
2. Didn't we jump the gun a while back when the U.N. was doi...
08/13/06 CeeBee2Excellent or Above Average Answer
3. Because of all the news coverage it is safe to say that the ...
08/13/06 captainoutrageousExcellent or Above Average Answer
4. Different points of view? The British like to be thorough, w...
08/13/06 MathatmacoatExcellent or Above Average Answer
5. Think how much more effective it would have been to wait unt...
08/14/06 labmanAverage Answer
6. If this is true then I can only speculate . Perhaps they wer...
08/14/06 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
7. Cooperation is going to be very important if we wish to prot...
08/14/06 drgadeAverage Answer
8. What I make of it is that the Brits wanted to continue monit...
08/14/06 ETWolverineAverage Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.