Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 08:51:51 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
Second Lebanon Question dimwit 07/25/06

    Hello:

    My simplistic view of the world has raised a concern. Hopefully, the Wolverine, and others will set me straight.

    I used to think of the US as the most dominant force on the planet. Then we lost in Vietnam. Then we lost in Lebanon in ’82. We’re losing in Iraq, and nobody has ever controlled Afghanistan.

    My point is, I think the Islamists have the Americans number. Contrarily, and notwithstanding huge and longstanding lapses, I think the Israeli’s have ALWAYS had the Arabs number.

    My question, and my concern is, has that equation changed?

    dum

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 07/25/06 3:55 pm:
      learned a lot from their brothers in Iraq.

      not quite ;and yes they have demonstrated some sophisticated tactics as well as command and control.. They have not demonstrated any of the insurgency tactics at all .The have dug in to the terrain motre simular to the Japanese at Okinawa . it remains to be seen if they fall back into an insugency of attrition . Anyway ;they are trained by Iran Revolutionary Guard .

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 07/25/06 4:53 pm:
      Those Japanese were very hard to root out. We paid a very high price...

      yes we did ,and that was why I mentioned the issue of their true commitment to martyrdom. Also our air superiority was challenged at Okinawa to a degree and our ordinance was not quite as capable as todays bunker busters or as Elliot pointed out the hyperbaric bombs that we proved were very effective during Tora Bora .

      Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 07/25/06 6:10 pm:
      Dim,

      Yes, the Israelis are running into more sophisticated tactics than they had expected, but nothing they can't handle.

      I find it interesting that Hizbollah are using tactics that are most often used by standing armies rather than terrorist groups. (With the exception of the fact that they are doing so while hiding among civilians, of course.) That is an interesting development, and one that actually plays to Israel's strengths. Israel's military is trained and experienced and equiped for this kind of warfare. The Hez really aren't, for all that they learned a few tricks in Iraq. Hizbollah are really terrorists at heart, and their most effective tactics are attacking civillians and hiding among civillians. Stand-up battles are not really their strong point. Israel is set up for that sort of urban and/or trench warfare. So I have to wonder if whoever is calling the shots for Hizbollah is as much of a military idiot as he seems to be. So far it looks that way.

      Israel is methodical in its tactics. They will move house by house, apartment by apartment, block by block and trench by trench to clear out an entire area. That is what they are doing now. That sort of urban warfare is the dirtiest, messiest, nastiest kind of warfare that a soldier can fight. Hizbollah can't really handle that sort of battle for very long, whereas Israel has proven that they can fight that sort of battle for years at a time if they have to, without stopping, just as they have been doing in the West Bank and Gaza for the past couple of decades. Yes, progress is slow, but it is still progress. And if Israel's military leaders say that they can clear the proposed buffer zone in a matter of weeks, you can assume they know exactly what they are talking about.

      Oh, and Rummy was right... the US military took out the Iraqi military in about a month. His prediction on that score was correct. But he clearly underestimated what would happen after major warfare was over. He underestimated the amount of insurgency that there would be. Still it isn't anything that our troops can't handle if they are allowed to do so.

      Plus, I wonder if some of the "insurgents" in Iraq who are feeling the heat might not pull out of Iraq and set their sights on a "new" battlefield... the one in Lebanon. That would split their strength further, and pit the "insurgents" against the two most capable military forces in the entire world. Or they might stay put and get their buts handed to them by our troops in Iraq a little at a time. Either way, it works out fine by me.

      Elliot

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 07/26/06 9:57 am:
      I heard a report yesterday about 1500 Mahdi Army volunteers are headed to Lebanon.

      The Hezbollah fighter were trained by Iranian Revolutionary Guard trainers .The insurgeny in Iraq are Baath and Fedaheen holdovers and remnants . They were trained by Spetsnaz or whatever Russia calls their elites nowadays . That is why they have been so troublesome.

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. First of all, we didn't lose Vietnam because we lost the ...
07/25/06 ETWolverineExcellent or Above Average Answer
2. Hello dimwit, Are you suggesting "Full speed ahead" f...
07/25/06 powderpuffExcellent or Above Average Answer
3. It is true that jihadists got a false impression of the figh...
07/25/06 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
4. Great military nations can win conventional wars. When we f...
07/25/06 drgadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
5. I think that Israel and America have always had "Islamist...
07/25/06 jackreadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
6. Which equation is that? Might = Right? you will always loos...
07/26/06 paracleteExcellent or Above Average Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.