or
Join Now!
|
|
Home/Government/Politics
|
| Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
| Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
| WMDs revisited. |
ETWolverine |
06/23/06 |
Let's see now. What could possibly point to the fact that Saddam really did have WMDs?
1) 500 TONS (that's 1 million pounds) of yellowcake uranium was found in Iraq.
2) 500 sarin and mustard gas filled weapons were found in Iraq.
3) The Dalfour report, which every liberal points to over the fact that it says that Saddam didn't have "stockpiles" of WMDs, clearly also states that Saddam had WMD programs in place, including an anthrax production facility that could produce anthrax-filled weapons within 4 weeks of releasing the UN sanctions. (Interesting how that part of the Dalfour report is completely ignored by the left.)
4) We have documents and audio tapes that prove that Saddam and his administration were deliberately hiding WMDs and lying about their existance and in what amounts to the UN inspection teams.
5) If Saddam didn't have such WMD programs, why were two of his cabinet officials nicknamed "Chemical Ali" and "Dr. Germ" by Iraqi officials?
6) Let's not forget that Saddam had used WMDs against Iran and the Kurds before as well, so claiming that he never had WMDs is just purely rediculous.
C'mon, lefties. The perponderance of "in-your-face" evidence is huge. When are you guys going to admitt that Bush was right all along?
Elliot |
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|
