Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 08:24:46 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
For Jackreade, ETWolverine 06/14/06
    From today's NY Post.

    MURTHA'S RUSH TO JUDGMENT
    By ILARIO PANTANO

    June 14, 2006 -- EDITOR'S NOTE: Ilario Pantano wrote the following letter to The Washington Post (which printed it), but we believe it's of interest to New York Post readers, too.


    A year ago I was charged with two counts of premeditated murder and with other war crimes related to my service in Iraq. My wife and mother sat in a Camp Lejeune courtroom for five days while prosecutors painted me as a monster; then autopsy evidence blew their case out of the water, and the Marine Corps dropped all charges against me ["Marine Officer Cleared in Killing of Two Iraqis," Washington Post news story, May 27, 2005].

    So I know something about rushing to judgment, which is why I am so disturbed by the remarks of Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) regarding the Haditha incident ["Death Toll Rises in Haditha Attack, GOP Leader Says," news story, May 20]. Mr. Murtha said, "Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them, and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood."
    In the United States, we have a civil and military court system that relies on an investigatory and judicial process to make determinations based on evidence. The system is not served by such grand pronouncements of horror and guilt without the accuser even having read the investigative report.

    Mr. Murtha's position is particularly suspect when he is quoted by news services as saying that the strain of deployment "has caused them [the Marines] to crack in situations like this." Not only is he certain of the Marines' guilt but he claims to know the cause, which he conveniently attributes to a policy he opposes.

    Members of the U.S. military serving in Iraq need more than Mr. Murtha's pseudo-sympathy. They need leaders to stand with them even in the hardest of times. Let the courts decide if these Marines are guilty. They haven't even been charged with a crime yet, so it is premature to presume their guilt - unless that presumption is tied to a political motive.

    Ilario Pantano
    Jacksonville, N.C.


    And that is why I say that Murtha is anti-soldier and makes his anti-soldier statements based on political ambitions.

Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. the only way Murtha can call himself pro-military is that he...
06/14/06 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
2. People that shoot off their mouths and make public judgement...
06/14/06 purplewingsExcellent or Above Average Answer
3. Murtha is increasingly showing what a pathetic excuse for a ...
06/14/06 ItsdbExcellent or Above Average Answer
4. Don't put my name on the Subject Line...that is against u...
06/14/06 jackreadePoor or Incomplete Answer
5. And I do agree with you SO much! It still scares me to thin...
06/15/06 drgadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.