Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 05:45:39 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
Charitable Cheney kindj 05/07/06
    Charitable Dick Cheney, media's best-kept secret
    JOHN REINIERS


    Let Vice President Cheney unload a hail of buckshot - and it makes mainstream media headlines as a defining moment is his failed vice presidency.


    Let him file his federal tax return and it is reported by CBS News that "Cheney tops Bush in the battle of the bucks."


    Let him donate what was the largest amount of bucks in history to charity by any public servant, and you guessed it - nary a headline.


    But then again it was a paltry $6.87 million, more than three-quarters of the reported income of the Cheneys.


    Read this again: The Cheneys gave $6.87 million to charity in 2005.
    A small story perhaps, but come on - doesn't a multimillion dollar contribution to charities by a vice president deserve special recognition? Frankly, I was astonished when I first read this and thought it was a typo because it was buried in a column that leads off with President Bush's tax return - which wasn't even newsworthy - just the typical annual report on the tax returns of the president and vice president. As a matter of fact, the AP headline read "Cheney's income 10 times the Bushes'. And the L.A. Times reported: "Bush pays taxes, Cheney awaits refund,"


    I could go on with other headlines, but you get the point. Not one headline in the mainstream media that Cheney gave $6.87 million to charity. The "refund" headline by the L.A. Times is laughable. The reason he's getting a refund is because he overpaid in estimating his taxes and had too much withheld. Another paper spun the AP story by saying not only did Cheney make ten times as much as Bush, but "He is looking for a $1.9 million refund." What gall.


    Another equally compelling headline would have been when a former vice president's tax return - Al Gore's - reported a paltry $367 in charitable contributions in 1997. Of course this item never made the headlines either - given the bias of the mainstream media.


    The Cheney's income was largely the result of his exercising stock options from his stint at Halliburton, some deferred compensation and royalties from three books written by Mrs. Cheney.


    Of interest, the AP story referred to Cheney's adjusted gross income as "largely padded" with income he received by exercising stock options that had been set aside for charity. Here's a guy that sets up a gift arrangement for charity with Halliburton when he took office in 2001 and the AP elects to describe his return as being "padded" -- this was income earmarked for charity in 2001. Why the use of such a pejorative term? (Like padding an expense account.)


    The Washington Post couldn't resist referring to Halliburton as "a large military contractor in Iraq," as if Iraq had something to do with this story. And so as to belittle this astounding donation, the Post said "the Cheneys appear to have taken advantage of a special tax break." Hey, anybody who gives three quarters of what they've earned to charity deserves a tax break.


    The majority of Americans do not realize how devastatingly effective the media is in shaping attitudes. They can and will destroy the reputations of those they oppose. What is so alarming is that the media mistakes their limitations for high standards.

    John Reiniers is a columnist for Hernando Today. He lives in Spring Hill.

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 05/08/06 3:41 pm:
      I did some additional digging .

      Cheney's Halliburton income was an issue in the 2000 election ;specifically his future stock options. These being tied to the rise and fall of Halliburton stock, presented a potential conflict of interest because, as Vice President, it was conceivable that he could influence stock prices. To take the issue off the table Cheney decided to donate those stock options to charity through an irrevocable gift agreement .

      Clarification/Follow-up by excon on 05/08/06 3:55 pm:

      Hello guys:

      I don't mean "duck" as in quack. I mean "duck" as in, get yer fkng head down.

      excon

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. What ? That can't be ! As Reiniers wrote ;Here was the ...
05/07/06 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
2. It is absolutely disgusting and sickening to read about the ...
05/07/06 ROLCAMExcellent or Above Average Answer
3. It is absolutely disgusting and sickening to read about the ...
05/07/06 jocaseExcellent or Above Average Answer
4. The media is run by large corporations. Newspapers, TV Netwo...
05/07/06 fredgExcellent or Above Average Answer
5. Such a revelation would ruin the goal of the liberal media. ...
05/07/06 drgadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
6. Hello kindj: The media hasn't influenced me. I love Du...
05/07/06 exconExcellent or Above Average Answer
7. Thank you very much for sharing this information. And wheth...
05/07/06 captainoutrageousExcellent or Above Average Answer
8. I think it's great that the Cheney's give this much to...
05/07/06 purplewingsExcellent or Above Average Answer
9. What, you mean Cheney actually did something GOOD? Nah... i...
05/08/06 ETWolverineExcellent or Above Average Answer
10. Dennis, it's the old damned if you do and damned if you d...
05/08/06 ItsdbExcellent or Above Average Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.