Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 08:51:54 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
"Failed States" jackreade 05/01/06
    Book Review cut and paste from Amazon dot com follows:

    "Forget Iraq and Sudan--America is the foremost failed state, argues the latest polemic from America's most controversial Left intellectual. Chomsky (Imperial Ambitions) contends the U.S. government wallows in lawless military aggression (the Iraq war is merely the latest example); ignores public opinion on everything from global warming to social spending and foreign policy; and jeopardizes domestic security by under-funding homeland defense in favor of tax cuts for the rich and by provoking hatred and instability abroad that may lead to terrorist blowback or nuclear conflict. Ranging haphazardly from the Seminole War forward, Chomsky's jeremiad views American interventionism as a pageant of imperialist power-plays motivated by crass business interests. Disdaining euphemisms, he denounces American "terror" and "war crimes," castigates the public-bamboozling "government-media propaganda campaign" and floats comparisons to Mongols and Nazis. Chomsky's fans will love it, but even mainstream critics are catching up to the substance of his take on Bush Administration policies; meanwhile his uncompromising moral sensibility, icy logic and withering sarcasm remain in a class by themselves. Required reading for every thoughtful citizen."
    Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    Are your fingers all a-tingle waiting to make an ad hominum attack on Chomsky?? Forget it!

    How about dealing with his ideas described in this book review?

      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 05/03/06 12:06 am:
      jack,

      Perhaps you don't quite get what an ad hominem attack is...

        An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin, literally "argument against the person") or attacking the messenger, involves replying to an argument or assertion by attacking the person presenting the argument or assertion rather than the argument itself. It is usually, though not always, a logical fallacy


      Aren't you the messenger? Did I attack you? Did you even present an argument to be attacked?
 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. I have nothing to say beyond contempt for Chomsky. I do not ...
05/01/06 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
2. he could be right! there is an inability to protect borders,...
05/01/06 paracleteExcellent or Above Average Answer
3. he could be right! there is an inability to protect borders,...
05/01/06 paracleteExcellent or Above Average Answer
4. Alright, let's forget who wrote it... let's just stick...
05/01/06 ETWolverineExcellent or Above Average Answer
5. Chomsky is a man of "uncompromising moral sensibility"...
05/01/06 ItsdbPoor or Incomplete Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.