or
Join Now!
|
Home/Government/Politics
|
Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
Sadri and the CIA |
JBodine |
03/21/06 |
I was watching the news last night, when I should've been working on my Biblical Interpretation project. I saw that Saddam's former Foreign Ministry (?) guy, named Sadri (or something like that), may have been on CIA's payroll up until the invasion.
IF so, good move by Spook Central.
In any event, his reports on Saddams NBC weapons program differed greatly from CIA estimates. News reported that BOTH were wrong.
What are your thoughts on who's closer to the truth? Sadri? The CIA? Neither?
What does that say about SH's craftiness that not even one of his top cabinet officials knew for sure what weapons he had?
DK |
Clarification/Follow-up by Erewhon on 03/21/06 10:38 pm: Sadri told his CIA 'operators' that Saddam didn't have WMDs.
Sadri was closer to the truth. Sadri knew, but soesn't it say a lot ablout Bush's cfraftiness that although he knew Saddam had no WMDs he managed to colnvince everyone else - almost - that he had them and was getting ready - within 45 minutes! - of using them against Bush's Crawford Ranch.
My grandfather was a comedian - Willis Gray - but he was not as deadly funny as George Walker Bush put together.
|
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|