Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 06:55:55 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
American Ports; no take-over fredg 03/09/06
    The American People have spoken; through emails, phone calls, letters to Congress. Foreign take-over of American Ports is dead. Republicans added an Amendment to the current Iraqi spending bill, stating NO take-over of American Ports by a Foreign Country.
    Republican voting was something like 62 - 2 in favor of not letting this happen.
    Democrats were already opposed, naturally.
    President Bush was ready to OK the take-over; using "trust in this foreign country" and "good will" as reasons. Main unspoken reason was the hugh amounts of oil money that are involved with this foreign country.
    The President can't Veto the Bill, cause he would be vetoing his own Iraqi spending Bill.
    Congressional elections are this year, and Republicans in Congress don't want to lose their seats; more important than being loyal to their President.

    Do you agree or disagree with this take-over being stopped?
    fredg

      Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 03/09/06 3:57 pm:
      Fredg,

      I should hope that Bush would keep big business in mind when making his decisions. He'd be a fool not to.

      Let's keep in mind that big businesses employ most American citizens. Let's also keep in mind that big businesses produce most of the products and services that we consume. They drive the economy. If Bush didn't consider them in his decisions, he'd be dead wrong.

      It's easy to say that Bush is "pro-big business" and "anti-the-little-guy", but it is an unfair categorization. Bush's economic decisions broke the country out of an economic recession, brought unemployment to the lowest level since July 2001 (before 9/11) and raised average hourly incomes by $2.29 since 2000. In 2000, only 36% of employees participated in defined contribution plans. That number rose to 42% in 2005. In 2000, only 4% of employees had access to employer assisted child care. That number rose to 14% in 2005.

      Seems to me that Bush's decisions have clearly helped the "little guy" as much as they have big business, both in terms of employment levels and in terms of compensation and benefits. And they have help the big businesses too.

      Elliot

      Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 03/09/06 4:58 pm:
      Excon,

      >>>It's got nothing to do with money. It's got everything to do with stupidity.<<<

      If it's stupid but it works, it isn't stupid.

      As I said, economic results show that Bush's policies are working. The development and emergence of democratic governments with popular support and improving economic and military situations in Iraq and Afghanistan show that Bush's policies in those places are working. Bush may have been wrong on this issue, and I believe that he was. But that doesn't make him stupid. He was doing it for the right reasons, to reward and support a country that he sees as a supporter of the war on terror. I happen to disagree with that categorization of the UAE, but that doesn't mean that the reasoning was wrong.

      Elliot

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 03/09/06 7:24 pm:
      I just wish the Republicans would show as much passion to the border issue.

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 03/09/06 7:31 pm:
      Sen. Warner announced on the floor today that DPW has agreed to turn over all of its operations at U.S. ports to a United States entity .
      If this is true then I now support the deal .

      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 03/10/06 2:17 pm:
      fred,

      You only magnify the problem I was speaking of, there was no "foreign country taking over our ports!"

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. I agree. The US is quite capable of operating it's own po...
03/09/06 BeelzeBUSHExcellent or Above Average Answer
2. The 'American People' are a day late and a dollar sh...
03/09/06 ErewhonExcellent or Above Average Answer
3. I happen to agree with Congress and disagree with Bush on th...
03/09/06 ETWolverineExcellent or Above Average Answer
4. i absolutely argree 100 percent! no foreign country should e...
03/09/06 sissypantsExcellent or Above Average Answer
5. 1st ;I do not like riders and I am glad that Congress is con...
03/09/06 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
6. At the present time, with the present fears of foreign influ...
03/09/06 drgadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
7. fred, I'm still firmly undecided. The only I'm sure a...
03/09/06 ItsdbExcellent or Above Average Answer
8. Americans had a revulsion to the news of the port deal. It h...
03/09/06 HerrAirhornExcellent or Above Average Answer
9. are you guys racist or what? It's ok for the British to o...
03/10/06 MathatmacoatExcellent or Above Average Answer
10. Duba announces it will pull out of deal. So this may all go ...
03/10/06 jocaseExcellent or Above Average Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.