or
Join Now!
|
Home/Government/Politics
|
Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
Presidential Power |
excon |
01/19/06 |
Hello rightys:
Hep me out here. The president said he has authority to stop Oregon from doing what it wants, but the Supreme Court said no. Does that mean that the president is sometimes wrong in what he can and can not do?
In relationship to the NSA spying, is it possible that the president is wrong? If the Supreme Court told him he was and ordered him to stop, would he? Should he? Is the Supreme Court the final arbiter of what he can do, or is HE? I really want to know.
I thought I learned all this in high school civics, but things aren't working out like they're supposed to. Did I miss some classes or something?
excon
|
|
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|