Finally, someone admits that it isn't about what Bush is doing that's so outrageous, it's just that it's Bush - a contention some of us have made many, many times on these boards. Leonard Pitts opened this column on the domestic eavesdropping 'conspiracy' with, "Another president, perhaps."
Perhaps Lincoln or Roosevelt (or Clinton?), but not "King George, if you will" as Pitts put it. Almost restores a little faith in the media doesn't it? Or did Pitts just have a momentary lapse and didn't realize what he was doing?
Steve |
