or
Join Now!
|
|
Home/Government/Politics
|
| Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
| Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
| CIA: 'Dysfunctional' and 'rogue' |
ETWolverine |
11/18/04 |
townhall.com
CIA: 'Dysfunctional' and 'rogue'
Robert Novak
November 18, 2004
WASHINGTON -- After President Bush nominated him to be Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), Rep. Porter Goss walked across the Capitol to meet with a senator he hardly knew and who had criticized him: John McCain. There he received advice confirming his determination to take a course that soon became the talk of Washington.
McCain told Goss the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is "a dysfunctional organization. It has to be cleaned out." That is, the CIA does not perform its missions. McCain told Goss that as DCI, he must get rid of the old boys and bring in a new team at Langley. Moreover, McCain told me this week, "with CIA leaks intended to harm the re-election campaign of the president of the United States, it is not only dysfunctional but a rogue organization."
Following a mandate from the president for what McCain advised, Goss is cleaning house. The reaction from the old boys confirms those harsh adjectives of "dysfunctional" and "rogue." The nation's capital has become an echo chamber of anti-Goss invective with CIA officials painting a picture for selected reporters of a lightweight House member from Florida, a mere case officer at the CIA long ago, provoking high-level resignations and dismantling a great intelligence service.
Veteran CIA-watchers such as McCain regard the Agency as anything but great and commend Goss for taking courageous steps that previous DCIs avoided. George Friedman, head of the Stratfor private intelligence service, refers to Goss's housecleaning as "long overdue."
That cleansing process has been inhibited by the CIA's fear factor as an extraordinary leak machine. Its efficiency was attested to when Goss appointed Michael V. Kostiw, recently staff director of the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Terrorism, as the CIA's executive director. Before Kostiw could check in at Langley, the old boys leaked information that Kostiw was caught shoplifting in 1981 after 10 years as a CIA case officer.
Kostiw then resigned the Agency's third-ranking post, though Goss retained him as a special assistant. Kostiw's treatment has enraged people who have known him during a long, successful career in Washington -- including John McCain. The senator called Kostiw "one of the finest, most decent men I have ever met."
The story fed by Goss's enemies in the Agency is that dedicated career intelligence officers have been replaced by Capitol Hill hacks. Their real fear is that Goss will put an end to the CIA running its own national security policy, which in the last campaign resulted in an overt attempt to defeat Bush for re-election (intensifying after George Tenet left as DCI ).
I reported on Sept. 27 that Paul R. Pillar, the CIA's national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, told a private dinner on the West Coast of secret, unheeded warnings to Bush about going to war. I learned of this because of leaks from people who attended, but many other senior Agency officials were covertly but effectively campaigning for Sen. John Kerry.
That effort seemed to include "Imperial Hubris," an anonymously published attack on Iraq War policy by CIA analyst Michael Scheuer. He has since left the Agency, but he was still on the payroll when the CIA allowed the book to be published. The Washington Post on Election Day quoted Scheuer as saying CIA officials muzzled him in July only after they realized that he was really criticizing them, not the president. "As long as the book was being used to bash the president," he said, "they gave me carte blanche to talk to the media."
Traditional bipartisanship in intelligence has been the victim, with Democrats cheering the CIA Bush-bashing. Rep. Jane Harman, ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, abandoned pretense of bipartisanship, and Sen. Jay Rockefeller, the Senate committee's vice chairman, never pretended. Both are attacking their former colleague who is now DCI.
McCain's use of the word "rogue" carries historical implications. A long, debilitating time of troubles began for the CIA in 1975 after Sen. Frank Church called it "a rogue elephant" that is out of control causing trouble around the world. The current use of the word refers to the intelligence agency playing domestic politics, which is an even more disturbing aberration.
-----------------
Now for my questions:
Has the CIA really become the intelligence wing of the Bush-bashing DNC or is this an exageration?
If it is NOT an exageration, can Porter Goss make a difference? Can the CIA's philosophy be changed by an outsider who is not part of the old boy's club?
Elliot |
Clarification/Follow-up by Choux on 11/18/04 11:01 pm:
The thing about the CIA "members" is that if you piss them off, they can ruin you or someone you love or whatever! very easily. I don't see how an agency of high IQ spies and tech wizards can ever really be "reorganized" much against their will. Maybe a few cosmetic changes.
Clarification/Follow-up by Choux on 11/18/04 11:12 pm:
labman::The Sunday all the talking heads were discussing that this woman was mentioned as being in the CIA, there was endless talk of why the Bush Administration "leaked" the info. CIA personnel are not mentioned in print!! The Bush Administration wanted to get even because of what her husband did. (I forget what it was, a book?)
*Everyone* agreed that the leak of a CIA person is *not* done.
Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 11/19/04 9:56 am:
Judging from the recent leak of a Goss memo that accordingly orders the CIA "do not identify with, support or champion opposition to the administration or its policies" I would have to say that he has a tough job ahead of him .The fact that his memo was leaked just illustrates how bad it has become.
He is ruffling the right feathers though. Dianne Feintein warned that his reforms could have " a significant and negative effect on the agency." Bwahhhaaahaahaa!!Hello!!! The fact that the CIA was dabbling in domestic politics al all should scare everyone regardless of political persuasion.It is time for a top to bottom overhaul.
|
| |
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|
