or
Join Now!
|
|
Home/Government/Politics
|
| Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
| Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
| Surreality TV. |
darkstar |
11/03/04 |
Surreality TV.
In the end (as Bill O'Reilly would have been forced to reply in a deposition), there is one thing that almost hurt our righteous efforts in the 2004 election more than anything: our old nemesis, something secular people refer to as "reality." Seemingly billions of dollars spent to paint Mr. Kerry out to be a bumbling, incompetent scaredy-cat, were turpentined down the toilet by Mr. Kerry being sneaky enough to have stellar performances in all three debates. Mr. Bush, on the other hand, is better suited to scripted comedy than reality TV. He is better at "approving" a taped message rather than venturing into the more treacherous terrain of trying to articulate one live. At the debates, stripped of a script and relentless adulation, our handsome President showed a snarling impatience more commonly expected on the mugs of the hourly help at Gucci than the Leader of the Free World. As we've learned from Victoria Gotti (that dreadful cross-pollination of Nancy Sinatra, John Belushi, Donatella Versace and a longshoreman), if the goal is to be respected, some people are simply not meant to have a reality show. And our handsome President was never meant to let reality show. Fortunately for us, as the growth of the evangelical movement has proved, Americans have never had much taste for that "reality" nonsense.
betty bowers |
Clarification/Follow-up by darkstar on 11/04/04 10:40 am:
i suppose this would have been better suited for the humor board than over here where no one even likes to smile
Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 11/04/04 11:04 am:
dark,
I'm smiling right now...see? ![]()
Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 11/04/04 11:05 am:
Drat, my smiley screwed up...
:):):):)
|
| |
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|
