Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 07:07:46 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
U.S. Air Cleanest Ever Since 1970 Itsdb 09/24/04
    2003 Status Report Shows U.S. Air Cleanest Ever Since 1970

    Cynthia Bergman 202-564-9828 / bergman.cynthia@epa.gov

    (Washington, D.C.-September 22, 2004) Total emissions of the six principal pollutants identified in the Clean Air Act dropped again in 2003, signaling that America's air is the cleanest ever in three decades, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reported today. Annual emissions statistics for the six pollutants are considered major indicators of the quality of the nation's air because of their importance for human health and the existence of their long-standing national standards.

    Emissions have continued to decrease even as our economy has increased more than 150 percent. Since 1970, the aggregate total emissions for the six pollutants [Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Particulate Matter (PM), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Lead (Pb)] have been cut from 301.5 million tons per year to 147.8 million tons per year, a decrease of 51 percent. Total 2003 emissions were down 12 million tons since 2000, a 7.8 percent reduction. (See summary table at: http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/econ-emissions.html ).

    "Thanks to this progress, today's air is the cleanest most Americans have ever breathed," said Administrator Mike Leavitt. "Now, EPA is taking up the challenge to accelerate the pace of that progress into the future."

    The Agency recently issued regulations that will cut diesel pollution by 90 percent, and later this year will finalize regulations cutting power plant pollution by approximately 70 percent.

    A major reason for the nation's progress is the innovative, market-based acid rain cap-and-trade program enacted in 1990. The Acid Rain Progress Report, also released today, shows annual SO2 and NOx emissions have declined 5.1 million tons (32 percent) and 2.5 million tons (37 percent), respectively, since 1990. The program generated double-digit cuts at its inception and is now maturing, with small fluctuations up and down as emissions gradually near their respective end goal caps.

    "Cleaning the air gets more difficult as the maximum benefits from existing rules are achieved and the low-hanging fruit is gone," said Leavitt. "The sharp cuts of the early years of the Acid Rain Program are behind us now, and it's time to take the next step to protect people's health – the next step is the Clean Air Interstate Rule."

    The Bush Administration's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) stands to be the acid rain program of this decade, enabling the country to once again enjoy sharp cuts in harmful pollutant levels. It will use the same proven cap-and-trade approach as the Acid Rain program, creating financial incentives for electricity generators to look for new and low-cost ways to reduce emissions early.

    CAIR will use cap-and-trade to address power plant emissions in 29 eastern states plus the District of Columbia. The program would cut SO2 by more than 40 percent from today's levels by 2010, and 70 percent when fully implemented. NOx emissions would be cut by 50 percent from today's levels by 2010, and 60 percent when fully implemented. The Administration plans to finalize CAIR this fall.

    "The Acid Rain Program is a national success story because we achieved early reductions, cost-effectively and with near-perfect compliance," said Leavitt. "CAIR will provide similar benefits, ensuring that our nation's air continues to get cleaner well into the next decade."

    John Kerry on the environment:

    Protect Our Health By Reducing Dangerous Air Emissions

    "As president, John Kerry will reverse the Bush-Cheney rollbacks to our Clean Air Act, plug loopholes in the law, take aggressive action to stop acid rain, and use innovative, job-creating programs to reduce mercury emissions and other emissions that contribute to global warming."

    Does this guy always run on implenting policies that are already in place...and working?

    Steve


      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 09/27/04 6:32 am:
      Sal,

      Everyone knows the air in LA is pitiful, but cities like LA and Houston do not make up the entire country. Personally, I see nothing wrong with Republicans disputing the liberal environmental fearmongering when the facts support it. Many of us don't relate to the smog problem of LA and are justifiably skeptical of global warming. Where I live you can literally see for miles and miles and miles...and we just experienced the coolest summer I can remember.

      Cool summers give global warmers the freeze

      FoxNews.com
      By Steven Milloy
      September 10, 2004


      "It's been a disappointing summer for global warming alarmists.

      Hollywood, Mother Nature and the media just haven't cooperated. Even with the unusual situation of two successive hurricanes pounding Florida and another bearing down imminently, global warming hysteria seems to be on ice for now.

      The summer began with so much promise for the climate control crowd with the release of the global warming disaster movie, "The Day After Tomorrow." While the movie made plenty of money, global warming activists wanted much more than that. They hoped the movie would foment global warming hysteria in the same way that "The China Syndrome" and "Silkwood" contributed to public sentiment against nuclear power plants.

      Instead, the movie was so over-the-top with implausible weather phenomena that no one — not even the usually global warming-sympathetic media — took it seriously. Then, unlike the movie, the real "day after tomorrow" turned out to be pretty nice.

      Across the U.S., summer temperatures were cooler than normal. Aberdeen, S.D., experienced its coolest August in 115 years with an average temperature seven degrees below normal (63.4 vs. 70.5).

      Michigan officials attribute a dip in visits to state parks and other outdoor attractions to cooler weather.

      "The water temperature along the [Lake Michigan] beach usually is in the 60s from Memorial Day to Labor Day, reaching the low 70s during the hottest days of July and August. Except for a few days in early July and again in mid-August, the water temperature never reached 70 this year," a Michigan official told The Associate Press.

      Portland, Maine's high temperature of 82 degrees in July was the coldest high temperature ever recorded for the month, and the average daily high was four degrees below normal at 74.6 degrees.

      An apparent heat wave in Monterey, Calif., this week "is actually fairly typical, it just seems to stand out because we've had a particularly cool summer so far," a National Weather Service spokesperson told the Monterey County Herald.

      It's hard to get people worked up about "global warming" when it's too cool to get in the pool.

      The final indignity of this summer forced upon the global warmers came this week with media reports on Hurricanes Charley, Frances and the coming Ivan. Though stronger, more frequent hurricanes are the sort of severe weather that activists want us to believe are attributable to global warming, meteorologists and the media just aren't cooperating.

      The Miami Herald interviewed National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration meteorologist Stanley Goldenberg and reported on Sept. 8: "Research Goldenberg conducted with NOAA scientist Chris Landsea, private expert William Gray and others found distinct patterns of low-activity hurricane periods and high-activity periods, each of which endured for decades. These patterns, unrelated to the current concern over global warming, are caused by regular cycles of oceanic and atmospheric phenomena, such as unusually warm water in hurricane breeding grounds."

      The New York Times reported on Sept. 5: "Global warming is not a significant factor in this year's storminess, experts said. While some climate models predict that warming might eventually mean somewhat stronger hurricanes, that effect is expected to be very small compared to the natural hurricane cycle."

      The Washington Post began a Sept. 3 article with, "Bad luck, not global warming, is the best explanation for the arrival of two severe hurricanes on the Florida peninsula in three weeks, several experts said yesterday."

      These reports must be particularly bitter pills to swallow for the activists since the Times, Post and Herald don't typically pass up opportunities to promote the agenda of global warmers. As the summer fades into fall, so too will fade the season for global warming polemics."

      I'm skeptical of alarmist science and politics, Sal, and my biggest beef with this election cycle is the truth doesn't matter...particularly from the left. The party of 'intellect' has for too long used science, often junk science, to justify their attempted takeover of societal values and scare people into voting for them. Because, as we all 'know', only the democrats can save us.

      Clarification/Follow-up by Saladin on 09/27/04 9:36 am:

      Thank you for your post, Steve.

      Global warming is a present reality. Even GW has finally admitted that, even though it has been known for many years.

      The question needs addressing outside the poitical arena. It will be small comfort to anyone to be right but gassed to death.

      Sal

      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 09/27/04 10:01 am:
      Sal,

      Nobody wants to be gassed to death, Republican or Democrat, and you are correct in that the question needs to be addressed outside the political arena. The point is, we don't have all the facts on "global warming", and many of the facts dispute current fears that are being used for political leverage...and that's just plain wrong.

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. I guess it depends who you are going to believe . Here is a...
09/24/04 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
2. If he were to do something new, some people wouldn't like...
09/24/04 drgadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
3. Being that I'm a registered Democrat, one of the first th...
09/24/04 YiddishkeitExcellent or Above Average Answer
4. US air is some of the worst in the civilised world. Saying ...
09/26/04 SaladinExcellent or Above Average Answer
5. All of this environmental garbage is an attempt to appeal to...
09/27/04 ETWolverineExcellent or Above Average Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.