Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 05:45:44 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Government/Politics

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Question Board

Question Details Asked By Asked On
Love that media spin... Itsdb 08/25/04
    The Associated Press put some nice spin on the 527 ad wars on the front page of my local paper.

    They report the top groups in this presidential battle as:

    Pro-Democratic:

    1. Media Fund: $28.1 million.

    2. ACT NOW PAC, also known as America Coming Together: $26.9 million.

    Pro-Republican:

    1. Republican Governors Association: $32.5 million.

    2. The Club for Growth: $8.5 million.

    Well, they got the first part right...but the top pro-Republican 527 in this election is The Club for Growth. The Republican Governors Association's primary mission is electing Republican governors, and according to Publicintegrity.org has expenditures of $24,474,202 since the year 2000, with a whopping $2,938,033 spent this year, none of which went to smearing Kerry in this election cycle.

    The AP implies the RGA is the top soft money spender in the anti-Kerry game, yet omits any reference to the Democratic Governor's Association. The press hammers on Bob Perry's $200,000 in contributions to the Swift Boat Veterans but ignores the $26,630,000 contributed by Peter Lewis and George Soros alone to defeat Bush. The true top pro-Republican player in the presidential election, Club for Growth is number 7 on the list of top 50 committees, $62,086,165 behind pro-Democrat Media Fund, ACT, and MoveOn.org in spending according to opensecrets.org.

    Will Kerry join in condemning all soft money ads, or will he continue to try to silence only those that aren't favorable to him? What should Bush tell Cleland when he tries to present his letter to Bush calling on him to stop the Swifvet ads? Will Kerry stop the 15 upcoming MoveOn ads? Who's spinning these ad wars, me or the left and a friendly media? Does the truth matter any more?

      Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 08/25/04 8:36 am:
      Here are the top 527s. Just looking at the donors to them tells where they lean.

      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 08/25/04 8:39 am:
      Thanks Tom...I already offered that link :)

      For clarification, I omitted mention of number one on the list, Joint Victory Campaign 2004, as it is a combination of America Coming Together and the Media Fund. The fact remains that Club for Growth is the top pro-Republican 527, at number 7 on the list.

      Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 08/25/04 11:34 am:
      Tom,

      >>>I thought the growth of money and it's influence was corrupting the political process.<<<

      Tom, its not the growth of money, or even its influence that is a problem in politics. It is what is being done with the money.

      Money is a tool, and like any tool, it can be used for right or for wrong. It is HOW the money is used, not the amount of it that is a problem.

      If someone used a hammer to commit murder, would you make hammers illegal? Of course not. But that is what McCain-Feingold tries to do. It tries to take the "hammer" of money out of politics by limiting the per-donor donation amounts, and that cannot be done and should not be attempted. That is where you were wrong in your support of McCain-Feingold last year. The result, of course, was the creation of the 527s...

      By the way, you have my utmost respect for being a man who can admit an error and correct his thinking. That is a rare thing, and I respect you for it.

      The most hillarious thing about all of this is that John McCain is caught in the middle of the whole 527 thing. First he opened up his mouth to try to shut up the Swift Vets, and now Kerry is using his name in anti-Swift Vet ads without his permission. I find it hillarious that the guy who caused the problem is caught in the middle of it. Hoist by his own petard, as they say. (By the way, what's a petard?)

      In any case, McCain is NOT like you... he cannot admit the error of his law. In a recent interview (in the past couple of days, I think), he said that he has not changed his position on McCain-Feingold, and thinks it is a very effective law. He believes that we just need better regulation of the 527s...

      Some people never learn.

      Clarification/Follow-up by Itsdb on 08/25/04 1:50 pm:
      Main Entry: pe·tard

      Pronunciation: p&-'tär(d)
      Function: noun

      Etymology: Middle French, from peter to break wind, from pet expulsion of intestinal gas, from Latin peditum, from neuter of peditus, past participle of pedere to break wind; akin to Greek bdein to break wind

      1 : a case containing an explosive to break down a door or gate or breach a wall

      2 : a firework that explodes with a loud report

      I'll leave the jokes to you :)

      Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 08/25/04 2:15 pm:
      Too easy. I prefer a challenge.

      Though I will say that I'm not surpised that the French have had this word for so long...

      Elliot

 
Summary of Answers Received Answered On Answered By Average Rating
1. Kerry and associates seem to believe that 527 is for them on...
08/25/04 drgadeExcellent or Above Average Answer
2. I have done a flip flop on the whole campaign finance thing....
08/25/04 tomder55Excellent or Above Average Answer
3. One interesting result that we are begining to see from McCa...
08/25/04 ETWolverineExcellent or Above Average Answer
4. This election the Democrats have had so much panhandling via...
08/25/04 YiddishkeitExcellent or Above Average Answer
Your Options
    Additional Options are only visible when you login! !

viewq   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.