Clarification/Follow-up by Petesharky on 05/20/04 8:13 am:
You seem to fail to answer the question infact I don't quite understand why I would be an idiot considering I don't have your email address, infact I don't even know you. Since I am the one asking the question that must mean that you could only be referring to me.
Not to mention I drive about 300 miles every 2 weeks. My Mini van suits my needs considering I am an electrician and have to drive to different sites on a daily basis.
Seems to me that the idiots that you are referring to are the idiots that you call friends and family maybe you should use the bcc option on your email copy and paste your statment here and forward it to them.
Clarification/Follow-up by Petesharky on 05/20/04 11:28 am:
Elliot an excellent point. I never said this could would or should work but I am tired of these nuts going around with these absolutly crazy idea that one day is going to make a difference. Like the great American smoke out could possibly bankrupt Phillip Morris or other tobacco companies.
As I said in the question eventually the oil company is going to get the money. it just takes longer I also said it would take everyone to participate to get this to work.
This is a fantasy and I realized that when I wrote it. No one is going to do it. Even the one day fantasy didn't happen I bought gas yesterday. I will but it tomorrow.
But if given the 2 choices which would be a better way of handling it?
Considering that when I was 15 I worked in a gas station and gas was .89 cents for regular unleaded, and .87 for regular leaded that was 18 years ago i don't know that it has risen that much.
Thanks again.
Pete
Clarification/Follow-up by Petesharky on 05/20/04 11:46 am:
Great response and I tend to agree with you though I am not touching Bush/Kerry no way not here not home. Maybe because my brothers fight politics at every family occasion.
I agree that we need to find better means and safer means to than oil/gas / and natural gas.
I am not the author of the email. Just really pi$$ed off when I get something like this and realize that it won't work yet probably a whole bunch of people probably tried it. I wrote this question just saying that in a fantasy world wouldn't this be a better long term way of getting the point across. There are too many factors I didn't figure in and you guys seem to have pointed that out but. The biggest failure I see to my plan is you can't make people, industry would never be able to do it as pointed out in another answer. I probably couldn't do it either.
Thanks for the answer.
Pete
Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 05/20/04 12:03 pm:
>>>But if given the 2 choices which would be a better way of handling it?<<<
You're way... filling up half way... would be the better choice. Not because it actually hurts the oil companies in any way, but because it helps your own personal short-term cash flow situation. You get to keep your cash for a longer period of time, and make smaller payments for gas than if you filled up all at once. But that is an issue of personal finance rather than a macro-economic effect.
Elliot
Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 05/20/04 12:07 pm:
By the way, a 1 day "gas-out" would result in a downward cash flow blip of only 0.2% for the oil companies (on an anuual basis)... hardly enough to make them beg for mercy.
Clarification/Follow-up by tomder55 on 05/20/04 12:11 pm:
it bothered me also ,and since I got it from a family member ,I had to set it right;so I responded in kind. I asked when they planned to fill up ;the day before ,or the day after .
Clarification/Follow-up by Petesharky on 05/20/04 12:53 pm:
Hi Elliot I like that answer. But in the long run to me either way is seems like it would become just one big pain in the A$$.
Do you think the price has really jumped considering 18 years ago it was .89 cents?
Pete
Clarification/Follow-up by Petesharky on 05/20/04 12:58 pm:
Gee sorry xChoux next time I will consult you then it will be one idiot to another. This is just a topic of discussion no need to get all upset and start calling names.
Clarification/Follow-up by ETWolverine on 05/20/04 1:02 pm:
Clearly it has. And just as clearly, prices are being controlled from the supply side... that is OPEC.
On the other hand, we really do need to take inflation into account. If we assume a 3% rate of inflation over an 18 year period, we should expect a price of 1.47/gal (assuming 0.89/gal 18 years ago). So the jump is not quite as big as you think. And if you consider the fact that we are in the middle of a war in the Middle East, it is not too surprising to see such high prices.
Furthermore, we are not anywhere near the prices or shortages that we experienced during the OPEC crisis of the Carter Administration. Part of that is the fact that we DO have the strategic oil reserve. Part of it is that we have established alternate sources of oil, including South America, Alaska, and Europe. More homes are also using natural gas heating instead of oil. Finally, oil use has become more efficient... the same amount of burn fuels an engine or a piece of machinery for a longer period of time, and also emits lower amounts of polutants. So we really are taking control of the situation from the demand side.
On the other hand, we still have a long way to go with that. I think that increasing our use of nuclear power would go a long way toward relieving our need for Mid-Eastern oil. But if I say that in the wrong crowd, I could get stoned. I happen to be very pro-nuclear for just this reason... I always knew we would get into a long war in the Middle East and that our sources for oil in the Middle East would become... tenuous, shall we say. For that reason, I've always believed that we should be pushing for nuclear sources of energy that are self-sustaining, relatively cheap, and not reliant on our Middle Eastern relationships. The technology is there, and its clean and safe. But we have heard so many boogyman stories about nuclear power that we are afriad to use it. But it would solve SO MANY of our problems.
Elliot
Clarification/Follow-up by XCHOUX on 05/20/04 1:14 pm:
Peter: Thanks Sarge, can I have another???
I didn't call you a name, dude. I characterized the post.
Clarification/Follow-up by Petesharky on 05/20/04 3:39 pm:
Got you sorry about that. Now drop and give me 20.
Clarification/Follow-up by XCHOUX on 05/20/04 4:44 pm:
P: :D
Clarification/Follow-up by Petesharky on 05/20/04 5:23 pm:
Don't laugh too hard but I filled up too, but yestreday. On the great American smoke out I smoked 2 packs. I don't even smoke.
I understand that his thing could never possibly work just posted the question to see what others think.
Pete