or
Join Now!
|
|
Home/Arts & Humanities/Philosophy
|
| Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Question Board
| Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
| It makes sense! |
ttalady |
02/06/03 |
Politics I know but this whole proving a negative really has me thinking beyond the obvious. You can not see, hear a negative. As in it is all a mind game. With the "Weapons of Mass destruction" and proving it, it has already been proven! It is almost so clear to me now that I could slap myself in the face. The proving of something that one can not prove (negative) is all because we are looking beyond the answer. The "weapons of mass destruction" suppose to look like that of bombs, bio-logical war heads, ect. When if you look at the man himself you have the "Weapons of mass destruction"! Do you not?
He has killed thousands of his own people, killed members of his own family, tried to take over a peaceful country (Kuwait), and has ties with terrorists. Now as one person finds that a nuclear bomb would prove that of "weapons of mass destruction", does not the mind of one man prove that he alone is that? As I have said before, Saddam could never prove this negative of metal. But the US has proved the negative that it is not that of metal, bombs, ect. It is just the man himself, he is the "Weapons of mass destruction"!
They better take him out or we are all in trouble!
tta |
|
| |
|
Your Options |
Additional Options are only visible when you login! !
|
|
|
|
