Clarification/Follow-up by Toms777 on 12/06/06 5:55 pm:
Fred,
a claim that you have no evidence is no proof of anything - quite the contrary. Where in scripture does it say that Mary was ascended to heaven bodily?
Anyone could create a tomb and stick no remains in it and sell "artifacts". That proves nothing.
Tom
Clarification/Follow-up by Toms777 on 12/06/06 11:28 pm:
Hey Fred,
You sure make a lot of conclusions, bnut haven't seen much in the way of evidence yet.
Tom
Clarification/Follow-up by Toms777 on 12/07/06 4:44 am:
Fred,
1) Mary needed a Saviour. A sinless person does not need a Saviour.
Luke 1:47
47 And my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior.
NKJV
2) Since ascensions ia a unique event, it would be up to you to prove an ascension. If you claim that unless we can physically prove a body is in the ground that it must have ascended, then that would mean that the majority of people who ever live ascended and if that were the case, then it would be nothing special, taking away the importance of it for Mary.
On the other hand, it is a logic fallacy to claim claim that lack of evdince proves that she was ascended.
3) She is indeed a heavenly saint. That is our point.
4) Jesus was and is perfect in all respects. mary wasn't.
Clarification/Follow-up by Toms777 on 12/07/06 1:37 pm:
Heb 9:27
27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
KJV
Unless otherwise stated in scripture, she died.
Clarification/Follow-up by Toms777 on 12/09/06 12:34 am:
Fred,
Mary herself said that she needed a Saviour and thus was a sinner - and this is recorded in the Holy Spirit inspired Bible.
Who should I believe - mary and the Holy Spirit or you?
Sorry Fred, but you lose that debate. I'll trust the very words of mary and the Holy Spirit.
I note that you have yet to show me any scripture which says that Mary was born sinless.
Tom