Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 10:45:12 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

Home/Society & Culture/Religion/Christianity

Forum Ask A Question   Question Board   FAQs Search
Return to Answer Summaries

Question Details Asked By Asked On
Pat Robertson says ... Erewhon 10/20/05
    You say you're supposed to be nice to the Episcopalians and the Presbyterians and the Methodists and this, that, and the other thing.

    Nonsense, I don't have to be nice to the spirit of the Antichrist.

    I can love the people who hold false opinions but I don't have to be nice to them.

    -Pat Robertson


    ====================

    Why is he right or wrong?

      Clarification/Follow-up by JeffreyBryson on 10/21/05 3:30 am:
      Come again . . . without the isinuating remark.

      Clarification/Follow-up by Erewhon on 10/21/05 12:17 pm:
      Jeff,

      I might, and then again I might not.

      What is Robertson saying?

      "You say you're supposed to be nice to the Episcopalians and the Presbyterians and the Methodists and this, that, and the other thing.

      Nonsense, I don't have to be nice to the spirit of the Antichrist. "


      He is saying that Episcopalians, Presbyterians, and Methodists are anti-Christs.

      "We have seen the enemy and it is us!"

      Clarification/Follow-up by JeffreyBryson on 10/21/05 1:40 pm:
      To answer you here is to become circular. I've already given you what I believe to be the correct explanation about his words and relevant views.

      Clarification/Follow-up by Erewhon on 10/21/05 3:35 pm:
      Jeff,

      I didn't expect and answer from you for the last clarification I posted, because I didn't ask you a question.

      :)

      BTW - I am already circular, but my diet is working and I hope to become more linear soon.

 
Answered By Answered On
JeffreyBryson 10/20/05
The fact is that there is a tremendous amount of secular humanism (to use a classic label) among those three denominations- "secular" referring to that which is *based* of "the world", of course, and not in Him and His salvific message and requirement, and that focus is born not of God but of His enemy. That's Robertson's point no doubt. He makes no bones about His belief that the Christian struggle and fight is precisely against that secular bent, and He's right about that. However, there can be fine line between not being nice to antichristian views themselves and not being nice to the holders of those views. Many people don't quite get that part right and end up antagonistic against both. He's right about not being nice if one can make that distinction but not if one can't.

Additional Options and ratings are only visible when you login!

viewa   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
. Bookmark Answerway.