or
Join Now!
|
Home/Arts & Humanities/Philosophy
|
Forum |
Ask A Question |
Question Board |
FAQs |
Search |
Return to Answer Summaries
Question Details |
Asked By |
Asked On |
Logic Can Be Fun - Or Can It? |
Bradd |
10/31/05 |
Read the following sentence.
"This statement is a lie".
Is the sentence a lie or not a lie?
If it's a lie, then the sentence is not a lie. If it's not a lie, then the sentence is a lie.
True or false, in place of lie, works too. |
Clarification/Follow-up by Bradd on 10/31/05 6:28 pm: slight correction:
for the quibblers - change "sentence" to "statement" - avoiding problems. Actually, either way is ok, but.........you know. Quibblers and all. Clarification/Follow-up by Jim.McGinness on 10/31/05 9:38 pm: There are people who consider this not to be a paradox, but it is commonly known as the Liar Paradox.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox Clarification/Follow-up by Bradd on 11/04/05 3:10 pm:
His example perfectly responded to Chou's comment.
I guess you didn't have fun with this - sorry.
|
|
Answered By |
Answered On |
Jim.McGinness
|
10/31/05 |
Bertrand Russell developed a whole theory of categories to try to get around this and other similar paradoxes. Based on this, and on Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem, the turn-of-the-century programme to reduce all philosophical statements to mathematical logic came to a stumbling point.
One way to resolve the problem is to say that self-contradictory statements, such as the one in your example, are neither true nor false. That's not really a solution, all by itself, because you can construct cycles or networks of statements that are individually not, in and of themselves, self-contradictory, yet the whole system contains contradictions. |
Additional Options and ratings are only visible when you login!
|
|
|