Question Details	Asked By	Asked On
BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS	Itsdb	05/19/06
Jesus with erection' ignites outrage Student newspaper publishes drawings in response to Muhammad 'toons Posted: April 26, 2006 5:00 p.m. Eastern © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com A Catholic activist organization has written to Oregon's governor and state lawmakers to protest a University of Oregon student newspaper for having published cartoons showing Jesus Christ naked and with an erection. In its March edition, the Insurgent, an "alternative" student paper on the Eugene, Ore., campus printed 12 hand-drawn cartoons of Jesus as a response to rival paper the Commentator having published the controversial cartoons of Muhammad originally published in Europe that sparked Muslim riots worldwide. The Insurgent claimed it published the drawings to "provoke dialogue." William Donohue, president of the Catholic League, said the university's president, Dave Frohnmayer, had been unresponsive to complaints about the drawings, so he had written to the governor, every state legislators and the chancellor of the Oregon University System, among others. Student newspaper publishes drawings in response to "The March edition of the Insurgent ... was one of the most obscene assaults on Christianity I have ever seen," Donohue said in a statement. "To make sure that the persons I wrote to understand how vile this attack was, I sent a photocopy of the two most offensive graphics: one was a depiction of a naked Jesus on the cross with an erection; the other, titled 'Resurrection,' showed a naked Jesus kissing another naked man, both sporting erections." Donohue also says there were other depictions of Jesus on the cross that were "so gratuitously offensive that only the most depraved would defend them." He also noted the paper published two commentaries attacking Catholicism. "That all of this appeared in a student newspaper, during Lent, on the campus of a state institution, makes one wonder what is going on at the University of Oregon," added Donohue. While not describing the more sexual drawings, the main student newspaper at the university, the Oregon Daily Emerald, also criticized the Insurgent. "The Insurgent editorial indicates a desire to show Americans why the original cartoons were so offensive to the Muslim world," wrote the editor of the Emerald. "According to the editorial, 'What is "not a big deal" in the US (sic) is apparently a humongous big deal to others. Why should we assume it would not be?' "However, printing home-grown cartoons depicting Jesus on a cross/pogo stick or Jesus on a cross/hangliding apparatus are not inflammatory in the same manner as the anti-Islam cartoons, and therefore fail to produce the intended empathy from Christians to Muslims." Added the paper: "Unlike the Danish cartoons, the Insurgent drawings seem intended to simply incite controversy for controversy's sake rather than making specific social commentaries." A spokesman for Frohnmayer contacted WorldNetDaily after press time to say that the university president had posted a statement regarding the controversy surrounding the cartoons: "I share your concern about the offensive nature of the content contained within the publication. "I understand why it may seem as if the University should have prevented publication or should take some action against those responsible for the publication. The Student Insurgent is not owned, controlled or published by the University of Oregon and is funded with student fees. Therefore, the University cannot exercise editorial control over its content. "The best response to offensive speech often is more speech. ... I am strongly opposed to speech that makes individuals feel that they or their beliefs are unwelcome or belittled, and I can assure you I will use all permissible means to respond to publications such as the recent Insurgent." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Last year, UO's Programs Finance Committee decided to de-fund a conservative campus magazine because a transgendered student was offended - by rejecting the magazine's 21 year old mission statement. On Tuesday, UO ruled against the students grievance filed against The Insurgent, saying it "did not practice discrimination" while affirming the statute on contributing to the "physical and cultural development of students." Any bets on whether or not UO's PFC will try to de-fund The Insurgent? Compared to the Mohammed cartoons what's the point of this? What possible good might The Insurgent think would come out of publishing these images? How does this aid in the "cultural and physical development of students" as required by UO's statutes on using student fees? Comments?
Answered By		Answered On
ETWolverine		05/19/06
Here's the kicker: if a traditional picture of Jesus (or Moses) had appeared in a campus newspaper, the sepparation of Church and State crowd would have been all over it, demanding that the paper in question be defunded or censured or whatever it is they do to get rid of campus newspapers. So what we have is an era where it has become wrong to show a public depiction of a Judeo-Christian religious symbol, unless that depiction is insulting. And on the other hand, we can only show depictions of Islamic symbols that are not insulting, and those must be published everywhere and everyone must accept them for fear of being bombed. That's just nuts. Elliot

Additional Options and ratings are only visible when you login!