Return Home Members Area Experts Area The best AskMe alternative!Answerway.com - You Have Questions? We have Answers! Answerway Information Contact Us Online Help
 Sunday 19th May 2024 06:27:17 PM


 

Username:

Password:

or
Join Now!

 

TTFNUAS's Profile

TTFNUAS is no longer active on this site!

No. of Unanswered Questions: 0
No. of Questions asked in the last 2 days: 0

Additional Statistics for TTFNUAS!

TTFNUAS: 2 areas of Expertise

Christianity

    Genesis contains doublets, the same story told twice in different ways, and is not a text book for Creation science. Genesis includes two conflicting stories of creation, which suggests that it is an oversimplification to insist that it was Moses who was the single author who wrote the Bible, and who wrote the history of creation in Genesis, as a kind of scientific text book to be used by Creation science. Doublets are found throughout the Torah. The famous story of creation (or I should say, both of them) is another example of the same sort of thing. It is obvious that we do not have a single source here, but rather two divergent myths. That mythology if found to diverge is not a concern, since the meaning of myth is found in that it is a myth, but when 'history' diverges this is a problem. This is important to keep in mind if one wishes to do creation science or have the book of Genesis taught in schools as history or as an alternative to the theory of evolution. First one must scientifically analyze the source materials in Genesis objectively, and determine whether or not it is possible to base any theory of science upon such a book. A myth has religious meaning, and the meaning of mythology is emotional and spiritual, and a myth has no value to science, or to history, never having been historical, but rather a religious myth. Sometimes people react to the word myth as though it was a dirty word like falsehood or a lie, but a myth is just a means of usings symbols to communicate in religion, which does not make a myth false, but it does not make a myth true in any historical or scientific sense. A myth is a subjective interpreation of reality while science and history require objective facts, and that is something altogether different.


Direct Questions Asked0
Answers Given210
Public FAQs Posted0
Avg. Response Time9hrs,19mins
Total Points:0
Avg. RatingNo Data

  • Suspended from Site
  • View My Public Answers!


  • Mythology & Folklore

      Genesis contains doublets, the same story told twice in different ways, and is not a text book for Creation science. Genesis includes two conflicting stories of creation, which suggests that it is an oversimplification to insist that it was Moses who was the single author who wrote the Bible, and who wrote the history of creation in Genesis, as a kind of scientific text book to be used by Creation science. Doublets are found throughout the Torah. The famous story of creation (or I should say, both of them) is another example of the same sort of thing. It is obvious that we do not have a single source here, but rather two divergent myths. That mythology if found to diverge is not a concern, since the meaning of myth is found in that it is a myth, but when 'history' diverges this is a problem. This is important to keep in mind if one wishes to do creation science or have the book of Genesis taught in schools as history or as an alternative to the theory of evolution. First one must scientifically analyze the source materials in Genesis objectively, and determine whether or not it is possible to base any theory of science upon such a book. A myth has religious meaning, and the meaning of mythology is emotional and spiritual, and a myth has no value to science, or to history, never having been historical, but rather a religious myth. Sometimes people react to the word myth as though it was a dirty word like falsehood or a lie, but a myth is just a means of usings symbols to communicate in religion, which does not make a myth false, but it does not make a myth true in any historical or scientific sense. A myth is a subjective interpreation of reality while science and history require objective facts, and that is something altogether different.


    Direct Questions Asked0
    Answers Given1
    Public FAQs Posted0
    Avg. Response Time13hrs,40mins
    Total Points:0
    Avg. RatingNo Data

  • Suspended from Site
  • View My Public Answers!


  • Link to this page directly at:

    http://www.answerway.com/p.php?e=TTFNUAS


    Email this page to the following address:
    (only one valid email at a time please)
    Note: This message will include your name and email information

    profi   © Copyright 2002-2008 Answerway.org. All rights reserved. User Guidelines. Expert Guidelines.
    Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.   Make Us Your Homepage
    . Bookmark Answerway.